The use of MMPI-2 in the evaluation of parental capacity/suitability in judicial assessments
Keywords:MMPI-2, parental capacity/suitability, child custody
Purpose: The purpose of this study is to investigate the parental capacity/suitability in judicial conflicts concerning child custody as well as childcare in cases of child disuse or abuse using the MMPI-2.
Methods: The MMPI-2 questionnaire is weighted in the Greek population for the last thirteen years. It is administered exclusively by trained psychologists to adults over 18 years of age with a duration of approximately 1 to 2 hours. The examinee is asked to respond «true» or «false» in a series of 567 items. A Case Report is used as example for the analysis of the personality and psychological profile of a woman requested child custody.
Results: The use of MMPI-2 enables substantial information to the psychologist referring to mental health of disputant parents, their personality characteristics, while depict their capability to carry out their parental roles. Furthermore, it features any possible problematic behavior, that may negatively affect their everyday life as well as their suitability as caregivers in cases of child abuse and disuse. Also, the moderate or high scores on the MMPI-2 Validity Scales K and L, as well as the lack of elevations in psychopathological scores at the Clinical Scales, may comprise an important beginning element, in order the psychologist to investigate the positive characteristics which are important to have a positive evaluation of the examinee parent.
Conclusions: The present case study focuses on the analysis and interpretation of the MMPI-2 Scales concerning parental assessment for judicial use. According to MMPI-2, the examinee does not show signs of psychopathology nor problematic behavior in general.
Keilin WG, Bloom LJ. Child custody evaluation practices: A survey of experienced professionals.Professional Psychology: Research and Practice(1986), 17:338–346, doi:10.1037/0735-7028.17.4.338.
Hagen MA, Castagna N. The real numbers: Psychological testing in custody evaluations. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice(2001), 32:269–271, doi:10.1037/0735-7028.32.3.269.
Butcher JN, Hass GA, Greene RL, Nelson LD. The MMPI–2 in Custody and Child Protection Evaluations. Ιn: Butcher JN (ed) Using the MMPI-2 in forensic assessment. American Psychological Association, Washington DC, (2015).
Butcher JN, Graham JR, Ben-Porath YS, Tellegen A, Dahlstrom WG, Kaemmer B. Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 (MMPI-2): Manual for administration, scoring, and interpretation(rev. ed.). University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, (2001).
Butcher JN, Berah E, Ellertsen B, Miach P, Lim J, Nezami E, Almagor M. Objective personality assessment: Computer-based MMPI–2 interpretation in international clinical settings. In: Belar C (Ed.) Comprehensive clinical psychology: Sociocultural and individual differences. Elsevier, New York, (1998).
Baer RA, Miller J. Underreporting of psychopathology on the MMPI–2: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Assessment(2002), 14:16–26, doi:10.1037/1040-3522.214.171.124.
Bagby RM, Nicholson RA, Buis T, Radovanovic H, Fidler BJ. Defensive responding on the MMPI–2 in family custody and access evaluations. Psychological Assessment(1999),11:24–28, doi:10.1037/1040-35126.96.36.199.
Cooke G. MMPI–2 defensiveness in child custody evaluations: The role of education and socioeconomic level. American Journal of Forensic Psychology(2010), 28:5–16.
Posthuma AB, Harper JF. Comparison of MMPI–2 responses of child custody and personal injury litigants. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice(1998), 29:437–443, doi:10.1037/0735-7028.29.5.437.
Siegel JC. Traditional MMPI–2 validity indicators and initial presentation in custody evaluations. American Journal of Forensic Psychology(1996), 14:55–63.
Butcher JN, Graham JR, Williams CL, Ben-Porath YS. Development and use of the MMPI–2 content scales.University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, (1990).
Morrell JS, Rubin LJ. The Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory–2: posttraumatic stress disorder, and women domestic violence survivors. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice (2001), 32:151–156, doi:10.1037/0735-7028.32.2.151.
Ritzler B. Predicting offspring vulnerability to psychopathology from parents’ test data. Journal of Personality Assessment(1981), 45:600–607.
Keane TM, Malloy PF, Fairbank JA. Empirical development of an MMPI subscale for the assessment of posttraumatic stress disorder. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology(1984), 52:888–891, doi:10.1037/0022- 006X.52.5.888.
American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry. Children of parents with mental illness.Author, Washington DC, (2000).
Bradley PE. Parental MMPIs and certain pathological behaviors in children. Journal of Clinical Psychology(1974), 30:379–382, doi:10.1002/1097-4679(197407)30:3<379: AID-JCLP2270300349>3.0.CO;2-V.
McAdoo WG, Connolly FJ. MMPIs of parents in dysfunctional families. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology (1975), 43:270, doi:10.1037/h0076517.
Otto RK, Buffington-Vollum JK, Edens JF. Child custody evaluation. In I. Weiner (Series Ed.) & A. M. Goldstein (Vol. Ed.) Handbook of psychology: Vol. 11. Forensic psychology (pp. 179–208). Wiley, Hoboken NJ, (2003).
Caldwell ABJ. How can the MMPI–2 help child custody examiners? Journal of Child Custody(2005), 2:83–117, doi:10.1300/J190v02n01_06.
Baldwin K, Roys DT. Factors associated with denial in a sample of alleged adult sexual offenders. Sexual Abuse(1998), 10:211–226.
Donnelly EF, Murphy DL, Waldman IN. Denial and somatization as characteristics of bipolar depressed groups. Journal of Clinical Psychology(1980), 36:159–162, doi:10.1002/1097-4679(198001)36:1<159::AIDJCLP2270360116>3.0.CO;2-Y.
Grossman LS, Cavanaugh JL. Psychopathology, and denial in alleged sex offenders. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease(1990), 178: 739–744, doi:10.1097/00005053-199012000-00002.
Haywood TW, Grossman, LS. Denial of deviant sexual arousal and psychopathology in child molesters. Behavior Therapy(1994), 25:327–340, doi:10.1016/ S0005-7894(05)80291-6.
Lim J, Butcher JN. Detection of faking on the MMPI–2: Differentiation between faking-bad, denial, and claiming extreme virtue. Journal of Personality Assessment(1996), 67: 1–25, doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa6701_1.
Bosquet M, Egelund B. Predicting parenting behavior from antisocial practices content scale scores of the MMPI–2 administered during pregnancy. Journal of Personality Assessment(2000), 74:146–162, doi:10.1207/S15327752JPA740110.
Carstairs KS, Richards JB, Fletcher EG, Droscher HK, Ecob R. Comparison of MMPI–2 trends in UK and USA parental competency examinees. Journal of Child Custody(2012), 9:195–200, doi:10.1080/15379418.2012.715548.
Erickson NS. Use of the MMPI–2 in child custody evaluations involving battered women: What does psychological research tell us? Family Law Quarterly(2005), 39:87–108.
Ezzo FR, Pinsoneault TB, Evans TM. A comparison of MMPI–2 profiles between child maltreatment cases and two types of custody cases. Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice(2007), 7:29–43, doi:10.1300/J158v07n02_02.
Smith SR, Hilsenroth MJ, Castlebury FD, Durham TW. The clinical utility of the MMPI–2 Antisocial Practices Content Scale. Journal of Personality Disorders(1999), 13:385–393, doi:10.1521/pedi.19188.8.131.525.
Harkness AR, McNulty JL. An overview of personality: The MMPI–2 Personality Psychopathology Five (PSY-5) scales. In Butcher JN (Ed.) MMPI–2: The practitioner’s guide(pp. 73–97). American Psychological Association, Washington DC (2006).
Murstein BI, Glaudin V. The use of the MMPI in the determination of marital adjustment. Journal of Marriage and the Family(1968), 30:651–655, doi:10.2307/349512.
Ollendick DG, Otto BJ. MMPI characteristics of parents referred for child-custody studies. Journal of Psychology(1984), 117:227–232, doi:10.1080/00223980. 1984.9923682.
Schill T, Wang T. Correlates of the MMPI–2 Anger Content Scale. Psychological Reports(1990), 67:800–802, doi:10.2466/PR0.67.7.800-802.
Han K, Weed NC, Calhoun RF, Butcher JN. Psychometric characteristics of the MMPI–2 Cook–Medley Hostility Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment(1995), 65:567–585, doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa6503_15.
Korbanka JE, McKay M (2000). An MMPI–2 scale to identify history of physical abuse. Journal of Interpersonal Violence(2000), 15:1131–1139, doi:10.1177/ 088626000015011001.
Land HM. Child abuse: Differential diagnosis, differential treatment. Child Welfare(1986), 65:33–44.
Lucenko BA, Gold SN, Elhai JD, Russo SA, Swingle JM. Relations between coercive strategies and MMPI–2 scale elevations among women survivors of childhood sexual abuse. Journal of Traumatic Stress(2000) 13:169–177, doi:10.1023/A:1007785201112
Velligan D, Christensen A, Goldstein MJ, Margolin G. Parental communication deviance: Its relationship to parent, child, and family system variables. Psychiatry Research(1988), 26:313–325, doi:10.1016/0165-1781(88)90126-6.
Nardi B, Pannelli G. Attachment patterns and developmental depression: A clinical and process-oriented cognitive investigation. Rivista di Psichiatria(1997), 32:157–164.
Pianta RC, Egeland B, Adam EK. Adult attachment classification and self-reported psychiatric symptomatology as assessed by the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory—2. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology(1996), 64:273–281, doi:10.1037/0022-006X.64.2.273.
Siegel JC, Langford JS. MMPI–2 validity scales and suspected parental alienation syndrome. American Journal of Forensic Psychology(1998), 16(4):5–14.
Ollendick DG, Otto BJ, Heider SM (1983). Marital MMPI characteristics: A test of Arnold’s signs. Journal of Clinical Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied(1983), 39:240–245.doi:10.1002/1097-4679(198303)39:2<240:AIDJCLP2270390216> 3.0.CO;2-U.
Richard LS, Wakefield JA, Lewak R. Similarity of personality variables as predictors of marital satisfaction: A Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI) item analysis. Personality and Individual Differences(1990), 11:39–43, doi:10.1016/0191-8869(90)90166-O.
Schmidtgall K, King A, Zarski JJ, Cooper JE. The effects of parental conflict on later child development. Journal of Divorce & Remarriage(2000), 33:149–157, doi:10.1300/J087v33n01_09.
Hjemboe S, Almagor M, Butcher JN. Empirical assessment of marital distress: The Marital Distress Scale (MDS) for the MMPI–2. In Spielberger CD & Butcher JN (Eds.) Advances in personality assessment(Vol. 9, pp. 141–152). Erlbaum, Hillsdale NJ, (1992).
Craig RJ. Assessing contemporary substance abusers with the MMPI MacAndrew Alcoholism Scale: A review. Substance Use & Misuse(2005), 40:427–450, doi:10.1081/JA-200052401.
Knisely JS, Barker SB, Ingersoll KS, Dawson KS. Psychopathology in substance abusing women reporting childhood sexual abuse. Journal of Addictive Diseases(2000), 19:31–44, doi:10.1300/J069v19n01_03.
Svanum S, McAdoo WG. Parental alcoholism: An examination of male and female alcoholics in treatment. Journal of Studies on Alcohol(1991), 52:127–132.
Workman M, Beer J. Aggression, alcohol dependency, and self-consciousness among high school students of divorced and nondivorced parents. Psychological Reports,(1992), 71:279–286.
Seeman MV, Göpfert M. Parenthood and adult mental health. In Göpfert M, Webster J, Seeman V (Eds.), Parental psychiatric disorder: Distressed parents and their families (2nd ed., pp. 8–21). Cambridge University Press, New York, (2004).